| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4280
   |
Posted - 2014.08.27 10:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Because it's a multi player game.
And you are the content.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4280
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 10:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
metalravenous wrote:
Personally I think the majority of the player base would prefer just to do their own thing.
also,
Why do you think this?
I use alts to facilitate my efficiency as part of a larger group, to essentially be two people in a group, not to replace anyone .
Everyone I know who dose this will have a similar reason.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4281
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 10:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
metalravenous wrote:Darth Bladius wrote:metalravenous wrote:Scipio Artelius wrote:Meh.
From my perspective, it just makes sense if you want to get the job done right, that you do it with other people.
I don't really see CCP forcing anyone to do anything in particular. Your choice. I have been scammed one too many times to see things this way. I am guessing as well you never had to wait a week to get some cynos lit because the guy who did it was in another time zone. when you wait for others you are paying CCP for nothing. You can-Št avoid multiplayer aspects in a purely multiplayer game. Plus if you are smart or just an average character, you won-Št be scammed... May not be able to avoid but can minimize interactions.
Why?
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4283
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 11:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
metalravenous wrote:
Because you I don't want to deal with other people?
then why are you playing the game that's famously driven by player interaction in literally every facet.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4283
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 11:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
metalravenous wrote:Seraph Essael wrote:metalravenous wrote:Burner missions are being used to force feed interactions that no one really wants to have and are just forcing people to get more accounts (tools for the job) and in turn making people use their hard earned isk to buy more expensive PLEX. Wrong. Burner missions are entirely optional and there is no standing loss for declining them. Also, obligatory Eve is a multiplayer game. Sure its a sandbox, but stop complaining when someone comes and throws sand in your face because you want to play alone. Burner missions are an example of a larger problem attitude that CCP has. I am not complaining about sand being thrown in my face I am saying that CCP shouldn't be trying to force me to throw sand in someone else's face and trying to make me think I will some how enjoy it. but they are completely and utterly optional, (and soloable, just hard) , I don't understand why you have a problem with them, you're not going to lose anything by choosing not to do them.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4283
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 11:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
metalravenous wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:metalravenous wrote: I am not saying you can't play the game how you want. I am saying that CCP shouldn't be making content that solely caters to or forces people into these situations.
Those two sentences mean the same thing. You want group content taken away from other people because you don't want to do it yourself. Your entitlement is appalling. No I want CCP to take a more balanced approach. Sorry if you don't think I should be valued as a customer just as much as you.
I don't like diet coke, I don't drink it. I didn't like coke zero either, I don't drink that.
I fact , I hate coke.
I do like Bushmills though so I drink that.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4285
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 11:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
Grog Aftermath wrote:
EVE doesn't exactly foster a good community spirit, but I guess it's not designed to.
You are so wide of the mark with this you aren't even wrong.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4285
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 11:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
Grog Aftermath wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Grog Aftermath wrote:
EVE doesn't exactly foster a good community spirit, but I guess it's not designed to.
You are so wide of the mark with this you aren't even wrong. I'm talking about the community as a whole, not individual alliances.
I know.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4289
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 12:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
Or good old indoctrination _o/\0/\o_
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4290
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 12:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
Angeal MacNova wrote:Just read the OP and skipped to the end.
Two things,
1. Never tried them yet but from what I hear, it sounds like the risk doesn't properly match the reward with these missions. In other words, they're not worth doing.
2. You hit the nail on the head with alts. These will encourage the use of alt accounts. EVE is pay to win after all.
1) then don't whine about them
2)no he didn't. Ye all don't spend time in assault frigates!? Shouldn't need alts for this.
Explain yourself.
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4349
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 10:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:So, since I've been called a lot of psychological terms as an attempted insult by people on this forum, I figure I might take it up myself.
The OP is exhibiting antisocial personality disorder, with a side of persecution complex.
Did I do it right?
you need to wish ill and/or death upon him and/or his loved ones, additional points for saying hes a virgin and/or lives in his mothers basement
baltec1 wrote:This is what happens when people try to pay to win.
thats ****ing epic
=][= |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
4397
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 03:10:00 -
[12] - Quote
Derath Ellecon wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Derath Ellecon wrote:I must have missed something. What content that you can easily do solo did they remove? Oh, it's not about that. It's about them having the sheer, unmitigated gall to offer something to a playstyle that isn't semi afk solo PvE. The nerve. Wrath and outrage and rabble! well sure it is. The only way CCP could really force players to work together would be to remove content that could be done solo. As far as I can tell the soloable content is just as viable as it was last week.
still *****ing tedious though
=][= |
| |
|